• identificador V&A de objeto: O195230 
• 100 Photographs: The Most Influential Images of All Time  

	Esta obra fue creada en Cuba y ahora se encuentra en dominio público porque su plazo de copyright ha expirado. Según la ley cubana #14 y modificaciones posteriores, Los términos de derechos de autor en Cuba son los siguientes:
Tipo de material Los derechos de autor han caducado en Cuba si... Los derechos de autor han expirado en los EE. UU. si...¹ Fotografías Usado hace más de 25 años. Publicado por primera vez en Cuba sin cumplir con las formalidades de derechos de autor de EE. UU. y utilizado en Cuba antes del 20 de febrero de 1972 Obras anónimas (no fotografías) Usado hace más de 50 años. Publicado por primera vez en Cuba sin cumplir con las formalidades de derechos de autor de EE. UU. y utilizado en Cuba antes del 20 de febrero de 1947 Obras corporativas y gubernamentales. Nunca (copyright perpetuo) Publicado antes de 1929 (hace 95 años) Todas las demás obras Han pasado más de 50 años desde el 1 de enero de la muerte del autor a) Publicado en Cuba sin cumplir con las formalidades de derechos de autor de EE. UU., el autor murió antes de 1947 o b) Publicado antes del 1929 (hace 95 años)
Nota 1: Para que un archivo esté alojado en Wikimedia Commons, debe ser de dominio público tanto en Cuba como en Estados Unidos.
¹ Para que una obra sea de dominio público en los Estados Unidos, sus derechos de autor deben haber expirado en Cuba antes de que Cuba se adhiriera al Convenio de Berna el 20 de febrero de 1997.
Note 2: Sin perjuicio de las condiciones antes establecidas, el Estado de Cuba podrá decidir transferir al Estado los derechos de autor sobre las obras cuando haya vencido el plazo de los derechos de autor para el creador de las mismas, según lo establece el artículo 48º. English ∙ Español ∙ 日本語 ∙ русский ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aviso legal Esta imagen es o contiene un símbolo prohibido en algunas naciones por las leyes que se mencionan a continuación, por ser una representación del comunismo, socialismo o estructuras gubernamentales similares o de partidos/organizaciones asociadas que lo expresaron: Georgia: Sobre la enmienda de la Ley de Georgia «Carta de la Libertad», N.º 1867, 2013 Hungría: Ley C de 2012 sobre el Código Penal, artículo 335 Asamblea Consultiva Popular de Indonesia: UU No. 27/1999 Seimas de Letonia: Enmiendas a la Ley de Seguridad de Espectáculos Públicos y Festividades (OP 2013/129.4). La prohibición solo se aplica en eventos públicos. Corte Constitucional de Lituania confirma el artículo 18818 del Código de Infracciones Administrativas. Quedan exentas de la prohibición las actividades de coleccionismo, anticuario y educativas. República de Corea (Corea del Sur): Ley de Seguridad Nacional (prohibido para símbolos o emblemas relacionados con la República Popular Democrática de Corea / Corea del Norte) Ucrania: Código Penal, artículo 436-1 Prohibiciones que ya no están vigentes: Moldavia: LPC192/2012 Polonia: art. 256 del Dz.U. 1997 nr 88 poz. 553 del código penal ha eliminado las referencias a imágenes y ahora solo abarca la promoción de ideas comunistas Estados Unidos: tenía leyes estatales y municipales; la Corte Suprema las declaró inconstitucionales en Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931) Las imágenes a las que se aplican las prohibiciones pueden incluir la hoz y martilloes, la estrella roja, emblemas/insignias, banderas o imágenes de líderes.

This file is in the public domain. The photo was used for the first time internationally in 1967. It is in the public domain by Decree Law no. 156, September 28, 1994, to amend part of Law no. 14 December 28, 1977, Copyright Act (Article 47) which states that the pictures fall into the public domain Worldwide, 25 years after its first use.

Cuba did not sign the Berne Convention until 1997, and this photo was taken and publicized 30 years before that and thus is in the public domain.

• This includes being in the Public Domain in the United States - Since the image was first published in Cuba without compliance of US copyright formalities and used in Cuba before February 20, 1972.

Of importance yes it is true that Alberto Korda sued that vodka maker Smirnoff based on his "moral rights" (under the belief that Che Guevara wouldn't support alcohol) that are independent of copyright status, while also attempting to obtain copyright ownership of the photograph. Although moral rights are not recognized in the U.S. - they are recognized through most of the World and part of international copyright law. Moral rights are included in Berne Convention, so if the photographer is still alive, he still can sue, even if the picture is public domain. However, the moral rights are not transferable, and when Korda died 2001, no one can control the use of the picture anymore under that premise. As to his desire to show he was the rightful owner of the Copyright for the image, that was never decided upon in court as the Case of (Korda v. Lintas & Rex) was settled "sensibly and amicably" out of court.

As Ariana Hernández-Reguant contends in (Copyrighting Che: Art and Authorship under Cuban Late Socialism Public Culture 2004 v. 16 pp. 1-30.) ~ "There was never any official ruling on whether the depiction constituted a violation of copyright." (pg 4). The author goes on to state that: ~ "Korda took the picture while working for a state-run newspaper, his actual property rights would be questionable under both Cuban and international law." (pg 4)

Of note as well before the photographer of the photo died, in reference to the image becoming a ubiquitous worldwide symbol, he also stated “As a supporter of the ideals for which Che Guevara died, I am not averse to its reproduction by those who wish to propagate his memory” — Korda [1]

ADDENDUM OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

All quotations come verbatim from ~ A Copyright Revolution: Protecting the Famous Photograph of Che Guevara, by Sarah Levy, 13 Law and Business Review of the Americas, Am. 687. Summer of 2007.

LEGALLY

• "The Berne Convention, which 160 countries have signed, states in article 7(4) that "it shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to determine the term of protection of photographic works."
• "The Universal Copyright Convention does not require protection for photographs."
• "In 1994, the World Trade Organization (WTO) implemented the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS), which allows the 150 WTO member countries to exclude photographs from the realm of protection provided for intellectual property."

IN CUBA

• "The first jurisdiction of relevance is Cuban law because Cuba is both the location where the photograph originated and the domicile of the photographer."
• "General copyright protection under Cuban law lasts for photographs retain copyright protection for only ten years from the date the work is first used. After the copyright expires, the Council of Ministers can declare the work as property of the State."
• "It seems that in Cuba the copyright protection in Korda's Guevara photograph would have already expired, and despite the claims of ownership from Korda's heirs, the State would now hold any rights associated with the photograph."

IN THE U.S.

• "A U.S. district court recently noted that "there is no uniform test to determine the copyright ability of photographs."
• "Under both the 1909 U.S. Copyright Act and the current act, in the absence of a will, courts determine the proper disposition of a copyright interest in accordance with the intestate succession law of the decedent's domicile. This holds true even if the decedent's domicile is in a foreign country. Korda was domiciled in Havana, Cuba."

IN THE FUTURE

• "Furthermore, the question of ownership is a significant factor in determining not only the transferability of the copyright protection but also the duration of that protection within different jurisdictions. A comparison of the relevant laws of Cuba, the United States, and treaties adhered to by the international community shows a variety of possible results when looking at the protection afforded to the Korda photograph."
• "It remains to be seen what the result would be in the United States."
• "The outcome of future litigation hinges upon the duration of protection available within a jurisdiction."